It is
difficult to be a United Methodist and not know that the issue of homosexuality
is controversial for our Church. I’m even aware that there is continued and
sustained talk about a denominational split, as some of our sister
denominations have done already. But I am convinced that the one thing we
cannot do is abandon the conversation to extremists on either side, because
they are happy to take aim and shot their opponents using us as their cover and
then turn around and express their regret to us, their collateral damage.
What is
at stake? The unity of the UMC, but more important what our unity means ̶ effective
Christian witness and mission throughout the world. There is no doubt, that together as one
Church, we are more effective. Many of
you are fond of C.S. Lewis. He says that after he became a Christian he was
amazed how much time Christians spent arguing about their differences. He was
much more interested with what we have in common. I invite you to be of like
mind.
What do
we risk? Aside from the obvious practicalities of who gets the Pension Board
and who gets the Publishing House, for example, we risk losing the talent and commitment
of some of our most gifted and Spirit-led members. Because there are gifted and Spirit-led
people on both sides.
How can
this be? How can it be that there are Spirit-led people on both sides? Because that
is the way it always happens. The Church
has always been fond of labeling people it disagrees with as heretics.
Sometimes the Church officials excommunicated, sometimes it elected to burn
people at the stake. Perhaps we would all benefit from re-reading Church
history. Who were some of those who left
their Church? Martin Luther, John Calvin, and, oh yes, John Wesley. These left
a Church that was too enamored of its doctrine and polity—their church law,
their tradition.
But
what about Scripture? Didn't these reformers take up the banner and follow
Scripture? Yes, but more important, they followed the living Christ into their
world. Didn't they care about order and
adherence to discipline? Yes, of course, but they also saw that legalism
spelled death.
So what
do we do? What should we do as a denomination? The way forward is difficult, but
Christians throughout history have not hesitated to walk through fire if their
faith and trust in God was strong enough. Should we quit or shake hands and turn our backs on our friends and
colleagues who disagree on this one thing alone? Are we so arrogant to think that
we know enough to divide Christ’s Church over sexuality? We are not talking about grand debates about
the nature of the Trinity or the divinity of Christ. We are not even talking
about the Real Presence in Communion. People shed blood and died over these
issues. We are talking about something that is quintessentially human. So will we
divide Christ’s Church because of our own limitations?
I invite you to think through these issues and become more informed as we seek to embody the love and grace of God for each other as we move forward. The world is watching.
Grace,
Kathy
No comments:
Post a Comment